Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - (Page 46) Implementing IT Solutions: Getting Physicians Onboard seven Western states, uses Agfa HealthCare IMPAX CV cardiovascular image and information management system. For Steve Cameron, program director for St. Peter’s Cardiac and Vascular Center in Albany, N.Y., the implementation of a Lumedx cardiovascular clinical information system required an intensive training effort, including a training disk that walked physicians through the process as well as the installation of flat-panel television screens in reading areas which continuously walked physicians through the login and search process, he says. “We have seen compliance increase dramatically—at Sinai, compliance is at 88 percent and at Northwest it’s 82 percent. The doctors are seeing the power of the system and how it complements our evidence-based medical approach.” Ev amaral, vice president of operations improvement, lifebridge Health in baltimore, Md The preparation process Identifying physician and administrative champions of the automated reporting process early on is vital, says LifeBridge Health’s Amaral. Communicating early and often was also key to the eventual success of the CPOE system. Both LifeBridge and St. Peter’s took time at every physician gathering—from grand rounds to staff meetings—to update physicians on the process and needs of installing and implementing the new systems. “Breakfasts and lunches didn’t work too well in this situation,” says Cameron. “Breakfasts were semi-successful, lunches not really, as physicians tended to leave early either before or in the middle of our presentation.” Sending out training materials in advance of or at actual training sessions helped at both Lifebridge and St. Peter’s to reinforce the message being communicated. St. Peter’s mailed physicians CD-ROMs that demonstrated the process, while LifeBridge mailed letters to each physician detailing the upcoming transition and noting the expectation that doctors would participate in the CPOE system once it was online. LifeBridge gave out CDs to each doctor at the training sessions, which were held in a classroom setting. For doctors who wouldn’t participate in the classroom setting, trainers went out to their offices to get the job done, Amaral says. At St. Peter’s, Darvan Durr, cardiac department systems administrator, did a lot of individual and ad hoc training. It helped, he says, that the physicians were familiar with him in his previous role as an audiovisual and pharmaceutical technologist. At Banner Health, super-users were trained at each facility and given the responsibility of getting any new users up to speed. The results Despite the headaches involved, Pavlicek says the rewards are well worth the effort. 46 Health Imaging & IT | april 2008 At Banner Health, it used to take anywhere from 24 to 48 hours to get a patient record into the electronic medical record system. Now, he says, “The physician can walk in, read a study, create the record, electronically sign it, review it and print it out. The staff scans it into the EMR immediately and it is part of the medical record.” At St. Peter’s, the Lumedx system has been rolled out in the catheterization lab and has helped to eliminate all transcriptions related to cardiac caths, saving both time and money. The upgrade to a cardiovascular clinical information system that supports PACS involved a transition to a paperless system, which also generated economic gains. Overall, cardiology volume grew 7.7 percent in 2006 in a competitive environment. For LifeBridge, the carefully thought-out planning and implementation process involved in bringing CPOE to the group’s two hospitals was richly rewarding. “We have seen compliance increase dramatically—at Sinai, compliance is at 88 percent and at Northwest it’s 82 percent,” says Amaral. “The doctors are seeing the power of the system and how it complements our evidence-based medical approach. In practical terms, compliance can’t get much better as some very complex orders will always have to be written out, so I don’t expect it to ever reach 100 percent.” In LifeBridge’s pharmacies, results have been equally dramatic: pharmacist verification times for orders have fallen 90 percent at Northwest and 80 percent at Sinai. Radiology turn-around times have dropped from 71 minutes to 35 minutes at Northwest and from 109 minutes to 77 minutes at Sinai, Amaral notes. It’s just what the doctor ordered. Healthimaging.com http://www.biomorph.com http://www.biomorph.com http://www.biomorph.com http://Healthimaging.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Contents On the Web The Enterprise News Update Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose 3D Rendering: Options Galore Thinking Thin-Client Modality Review Ergonomics & Design Special Section: Storage Strategies Imaging Tools Technology Outlook People & Technology Technology Review IT Trends Reader's Resource Stat Sheet Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page Cover1) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page Cover2) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page 1) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page 2) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 4) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 5) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 6) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - The Enterprise (Page 7) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 8) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 9) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 10) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 11) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 12) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 13) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 14) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 15) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 16) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 17) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 18) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 19) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 20) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 21) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 22) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 23) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Modality Review (Page 24) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Modality Review (Page 25) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 26) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 27) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 28) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 29) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 30) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 31) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 32) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 33) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Imaging Tools (Page 34) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Imaging Tools (Page 35) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Outlook (Page 36) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Outlook (Page 37) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 38) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 39) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 40) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 41) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Review (Page 42) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Review (Page 43) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 44) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 45) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 46) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Reader's Resource (Page 47) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page 48) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover3) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.