Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - (Page 70) IGRT, Cone-beam CT Fine Tune Cancer Treatment [ left: Three-view correlated cone-beam and simulation CT images for a lung cancer patient. Image acquired on Varian Medical Systems Trilogy Tx image-guided radiosurgery system. Right: benjamin Movsas, MD, Herndon Chair in Oncology Research, Chairman, Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich. ] ning CT to verify the target volume prior to treatment delivery. There is no room for error, says Movsas, as the stereotactic lung protocol is based on four ultra-high radiation doses in a two-week period rather than six or seven weeks of daily treatment. Each session delivers 1200 cGy (or “rads”) compared to 200 cGy per day in a conventional regimen. “It’s very intense from a biological standpoint,” says Movsas. The radiation therapy team makes adjustments in about 15 to 20 percent of cases based on IGRT results. The Henry Ford uses cone-beam CT to verify treatment targeting for a variety of sites, ranging from prostate to pancreatic cancers. Early data indicate that the regimen works. “Standard 3D conformal treatment yields local control of tumors even in early stage lung cancer about 50 percent of the time,” reports Movsas. “The stereotactic model is more efficient, better tolerated and more effective, delivering local control in about 90 percent of cases.” Although Henry Ford Health System also uses stereotactic treatment for spine tumors and other sites, the department strives to prevent over-utilization of the technology. A dedicated tumor board, consisting of surgeons, radiologists, stereotactic nurses, radiation therapists and medical oncologists, meets regularly to discuss appropriate 0 Health Imaging & IT | May 2008 case management for stereotactic treatment, referring some to chemotherapy, IMRT, surgery or other biological therapy as necessary. The radiation therapy department at The William Backus Hospital took a different path to the IGRT program. The hospital installed Elekta Synergy with 3D x-ray volume imaging in July 2006 and uses integrated cone-beam CT to treat most prostate cancer patients. The IGRT protocol is built on daily CT imaging. Images are acquired and digitally overlaid on a reference image to localize the prostate prior to daily treatment. Patients are shifted accordingly if images show prostate movement. Although the protocol produces highly accurate visualization of the target and uses more imaging data, it does not add a workflow burden. “Other than head and neck IMRT cases, which can take 30 minutes, treatment is delivered in a standard 15-minute time slot,” says Nass. The hospital has built on its successful start and is integrating the cone-beam CT system into head and neck, esophagus, brain and gastric cancer treatment. model requires therapists to use the software in conjunction with their skills and experience for daily image registration to localize tumor volume. It isn’t difficult, but it is different,” says Nass. She recommends sites interested in IGRT protocols learn more about the technology via a site visit or American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) meeting. The William Backus Hospital radiation therapy department took a staggered approach to training; four therapists, three physicians, a physicist and dosimetrist completed four days of on-site training in treatment delivery and electronic portal imaging when the linear accelerator was installed. One month later, the team completed conebeam CT training and started imaging patients. “It gave us time to get used to the system,” says Nass. The department also shared information about the technologies with the referring physician community, so they understand the appropriate applications for and benefits of the approach. Another essential element of successful programs, says Movsas, is a dedicated IGRT team. Henry Ford Health System created a multidisciplinary, experienced team with representation from nursing, surgery, medical oncology and radiation therapy, to steer the development of the program. future directions Henry Ford Health System plans to deploy Novalis adaptive respiratory gating system later this year. The new deployment should increase treatment accuracy by tracking and correlating internal motion of lung tumors during treatment delivery. on target IGRT is the platform for more accurate delivery of radiation therapy in a number of cancers, particularly those characterized by tumor motion. On-board conebeam CT provides a workflow neutral option that allows radiation therapy teams to implement highly individualized treatment and potentially deliver improved patient outcomes. HealthImaging.com getting started IGRT is a new clinical model that can bring significant patient benefits. “It’s a new way of thinking for radiation therapists. The http://HealthImaging.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 Contents On the Web The Enterprise News Update Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 Healthcare IT Salary Survey Survey Findings Inside the Transition to Next-Generation Image Management Blurring the Lines: Interfaced vs. Integrated RIS/PACS The Insider's Primer: Taming the Workflow Beast - Five Facilities Tell How Availability, Applications Drive New Archive Strategies Modality Review Managing Technology Inside Technology Reader's Resource Stat Sheet Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 (Page Cover1) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 (Page Cover2) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 (Page 1) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 (Page 2) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - On the Web (Page 4) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - On the Web (Page 5) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - On the Web (Page 6) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - The Enterprise (Page 7) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - News Update (Page 8) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - News Update (Page 9) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - News Update (Page 10) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - News Update (Page 11) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 12) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 13) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 14) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 15) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 16) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 17) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 18) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 19) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 20) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Convention Spotlight: SIIM 2008 (Page 21) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 22) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 23) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 24) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 25) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 26) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 27) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 28) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 29) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 30) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 31) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 32) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Healthcare IT Salary Survey (Page 33) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Survey Findings (Page 34) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Survey Findings (Page 35) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Survey Findings (Page 36) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Survey Findings (Page 37) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Survey Findings (Page 38) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Survey Findings (Page 39) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside the Transition to Next-Generation Image Management (Page 40) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside the Transition to Next-Generation Image Management (Page 41) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside the Transition to Next-Generation Image Management (Page 42) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside the Transition to Next-Generation Image Management (Page 43) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside the Transition to Next-Generation Image Management (Page 44) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside the Transition to Next-Generation Image Management (Page 45) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside the Transition to Next-Generation Image Management (Page 46) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside the Transition to Next-Generation Image Management (Page 47) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Blurring the Lines: Interfaced vs. Integrated RIS/PACS (Page 48) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Blurring the Lines: Interfaced vs. Integrated RIS/PACS (Page 49) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Blurring the Lines: Interfaced vs. Integrated RIS/PACS (Page 50) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Blurring the Lines: Interfaced vs. Integrated RIS/PACS (Page 51) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - The Insider's Primer: Taming the Workflow Beast - Five Facilities Tell How (Page 52) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - The Insider's Primer: Taming the Workflow Beast - Five Facilities Tell How (Page 53) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - The Insider's Primer: Taming the Workflow Beast - Five Facilities Tell How (Page 54) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - The Insider's Primer: Taming the Workflow Beast - Five Facilities Tell How (Page 55) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Availability, Applications Drive New Archive Strategies (Page 56) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Availability, Applications Drive New Archive Strategies (Page 57) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Availability, Applications Drive New Archive Strategies (Page 58) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Availability, Applications Drive New Archive Strategies (Page 59) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Modality Review (Page 60) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Modality Review (Page 61) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Modality Review (Page 62) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Modality Review (Page 63) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Managing Technology (Page 64) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Managing Technology (Page 65) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Managing Technology (Page 66) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Managing Technology (Page 67) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside Technology (Page 68) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside Technology (Page 69) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Inside Technology (Page 70) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Reader's Resource (Page 71) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page 72) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover3) Health Imaging & IT - May 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.