Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - (Page 40) Process Doctor PWB Cleanliness, Part 2 Localized extraction clearly shows residue volumes at isolated spots. Ed: This continues a discussion begun last month. e can define cleanliness from an observational or theoretical stance, but what do the data say? This is not to say a general understanding of the overall board is wrong, but rather that we need to understand the cleanliness of the critical areas. Using results from a large investigation of process variables, let’s look at two process variables on Umpire Test coupons. Group 1 used dirty (high chloride and bromide residues from HASL) incoming boards processed with water-soluble solder paste and wave flux, then cleaned with DI water. Group 2 used dirty (high chloride and bromide residues from HASL) incoming boards processed with water-soluble paste and wave flux, then cleaned with DI water with 3% saponifier added to the wash solution. The testing plan included localized extraction of the 80-pin TQFP using the C3 extraction system; then the 68-pin LCC breakaway coupon was ROSE-tested and the total board was bag extracted for ion chromatography and modified ROSE testing. Group 1 (No. 26) Bag extraction (total) ROSE testing (LCC) Modified ROSE 80-pin TQFP leads Cl Br WOA OM600 5.04 SMD W Figure 1. Umpire test coupon (above) with localized extraction area (above: circled in red; below: magnified). 5.1 7.24 - - 3.7 µg/in 2 NaCl equiv - 9.3 µg/in 2 NaCl equiv - 9.51 14.57 11.43 (C3 results 41 sec. = dirty) Group 2 (No. 72) Ch Br WOA OM600 1.53 - SMD Bag Extraction (total) 1.05 3.22 ROSE testing (LCC) Modified ROSE - - 3.0 µg/in2 NaCl equiv - 8.1 µg/in2 NaCl equiv 4.40 - Terry Munson is with Foresite Inc. (residues.com); tm_foresite@ residues.com. His column appears monthly. 80-pin TQFP leads 2.65 0.57 (C3 results: 151 sec. = clean) The tables showing the Umpire Assembly SIR results for both groups are online at circuitsassembly.com/cms/content/view/6019. The results reflect only a single board from each group of a much larger experiment. These individual boards are a good representation of the results of each group. Saponified cleaning (using low pressure) of the water-soluble flux on a dirty incoming bare board does a good job of removing ionic residues from the assembly. Conclusions The difference between bag and localized extraction of the boards showed a clear difference between the samples. The sample from Group 1 bag extraction shows acceptable chloride levels as defined by Foresite’s recommended limits (less than 6.0 µg/in 2 ) after cleaning, but the localized level of contamination is high for chloride and bromide, with poor C3 electrical response (which correlates to assembly SIR performance). The comparison between Group 1 and Group 2 reveals the same issues: Bag extraction of the total board shows a lower ionic level, while localized extraction shows a pocket of ionic residue that, in this case, is acceptable and shows good electrical performance under C3 and SIR testing. But comparing the differences between Groups 1 and 2 for the localized residue pockets gives a better residue understanding than do the total board in a bag or ROSE and modified ROSE when compared to SIR performance. A localized extraction gives a clear view of the residue volume between pads on a critical circuit, while the general assembly cleanliness is a different data point, revealing gross surface residues over the entire board, a reflection of process conditions. ■ 40 Circuits Assembly FEBRUARY 2008 circuitsassembly.com http://residues.com http://circuitsassembly.com/cms/content/view/6019 http://circuitsassembly.com/cms/content/view/6019 http://circuitsassembly.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Circuits Assembly - February 2008 Circuits Assembly - February 2008 Contents Caveat Lector Letters Industry News Market Watch Global Sourcing Better Manufacturing Maximizing Lean Copper As a Viable Solution for IC Packaging Embedded Active Components for High-Rel Products Cover Story: XRF Equipment As a RoHS Screening Tool Tech Tips Selective Soldering Test and Inspection Process Doctor Pb-Free Lessons Learned Product Spotlight Ad Index Assembly Insider Technical Abstracts Circuits Assembly - February 2008 Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Circuits Assembly - February 2008 (Page Cover1) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Circuits Assembly - February 2008 (Page Cover2) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Circuits Assembly - February 2008 (Page 1) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Circuits Assembly - February 2008 (Page 2) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Caveat Lector (Page 6) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Caveat Lector (Page 7) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Letters (Page 8) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Letters (Page 9) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Industry News (Page 10) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Industry News (Page 11) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Industry News (Page 12) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Industry News (Page 13) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Industry News (Page 14) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Industry News (Page 15) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Market Watch (Page 16) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Global Sourcing (Page 17) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Better Manufacturing (Page 18) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Better Manufacturing (Page 19) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Maximizing Lean (Page 20) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Maximizing Lean (Page 21) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Copper As a Viable Solution for IC Packaging (Page 22) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Copper As a Viable Solution for IC Packaging (Page 23) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Embedded Active Components for High-Rel Products (Page 24) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Embedded Active Components for High-Rel Products (Page 25) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Cover Story: XRF Equipment As a RoHS Screening Tool (Page 26) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Cover Story: XRF Equipment As a RoHS Screening Tool (Page 27) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Cover Story: XRF Equipment As a RoHS Screening Tool (Page 28) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Cover Story: XRF Equipment As a RoHS Screening Tool (Page 29) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Cover Story: XRF Equipment As a RoHS Screening Tool (Page 30) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Cover Story: XRF Equipment As a RoHS Screening Tool (Page 31) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Cover Story: XRF Equipment As a RoHS Screening Tool (Page 32) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Tech Tips (Page 33) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Tech Tips (Page 34) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Tech Tips (Page 35) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Selective Soldering (Page 36) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Selective Soldering (Page 37) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Test and Inspection (Page 38) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Test and Inspection (Page 39) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Process Doctor (Page 40) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Process Doctor (Page 41) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Pb-Free Lessons Learned (Page 42) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Pb-Free Lessons Learned (Page 43) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Product Spotlight (Page 44) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Product Spotlight (Page 45) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Ad Index (Page 46) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Assembly Insider (Page 47) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Technical Abstracts (Page 48) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Technical Abstracts (Page Cover3) Circuits Assembly - February 2008 - Technical Abstracts (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.