Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - (Page 18) PCB Stackup Analysis and Design, Part 3 PCB material selection requires the evaluation of electrical, mechanical and thermal properties, as well as price. POURING COPPeR on outer layers and grounding it with multiple vias can enhance shielding, reduce crosstalk and improve heat dissipation.26 Furthermore, copper/ground flooding (not to be confused with thieving, which involves applying dummy copper pads) influences impedance and can convert mictrostrip dr. ABE lines into coplanar configuration. Such (ABBAS) riAzi geometries can be efficiently analyzed with Polar Instruments’ Si8000 software27 that employs Boundary Element Modeling to forecast the finished impedance of various PCB structures. FiGurE 8 exemplifies impedance computation for a coplanar differential pair. The parameters comprise trace width = 12 mil, trace thickness = 2 mil, dielectric thickness = 8 mil, dielectric constant = 3.38, intrapair separation = 15 mil, line to ground clearance (horizontal) = 10 mil, solder mask thickness = 0.8 mil and solder mask dielectric constant = 4.5. Si8000 predicts differential impedance of 100.43 Ω. This denotes a nominal calculation, but frequently it is necessary to consider impedance tolerances. A typical tolerance value is +/- 10%. A differential impedance of 100 +/- 10% implies variation from 90 Ω to 110 Ω. Sometimes, it is desirable to have a tighter tolerance such as +/- 5%, since impedance tolerance often involves trade-off between impedance of PCB traces, package, driver output impedance and termination resistors. Tightening the PCB trace tolerance makes it feasible to relax the constraints on other parameters (package, driver, termination), but this also increases board fabrication cost. A 5% tolerance is more expensive to manufacture than a 10% tolerance, which is costlier than a 15% tolerance.25 Three main materials3 in a multilayer PCB embrace copper foil sheets, resin and woven glass cloth. Cores or laminate sheets are constructed by affixing copper foil to one or both sides of fully cured prepreg sheets. Prepreg mats are a weave of glass fiber yarns preimpreganted28 with partially cured resin. Several resin types are utilized for prepreg preparation. These resin systems usually differ in electrical properties (such as dielectric constant and loss tangent) and mechanical/thermal characteristics (coefficient of expansion, glass transition temperature and rate of moisture absorption). The commonly used FR-4 has a woven glass/epoxy resin composition. However, there are alternatives such as GETEK, MEGTRON, BT, polyamide28 and cyanate resin material, with attractive mechanical or electrical properties (low dielectric constant and loss tangent). 18 Fibers are applied to strengthen the resins; these comprise the electrical grade E glass and structural grade S glass. E glass is more common, but S glass is stronger and has lower Er (also more expensive) than E glass. Addition of fiber to resin alters the electrical and mechanical characteristics of the composite structure based on glass-to-resin ratio. FR-6 utilizes a polyester29 resin system plus glass matte reinforcement and is suitable for flame resistant 30, low capacitance or high impact applications. Solder mask / resist is a coating that protects PCB traces and prevents solder bridges and shorts. It facilitates wave soldering applied in mass assembly. Solder mask is a lacquer-like polymer layer often applied with a green tint, but it is available in various colors and finishes. A common solder mask 31 is Liquid Photo Imagable (LPI). For a multilayer PCB, the copper thickness does not have to be the same for all stackup layers. It is also unnecessary for all the cores to be of the same laminate. Hybridtype construction has been gaining popularity. The PCB conductor and dielectric losses 32 constitute another critical consideration. The DC conductor resistance is governed by Equation 5 All of the Equations can be found in FiGurE 9. Here, Rdc represents resistance per unit length for DC currents, ρ is the bulk conductor resistivity33, W is trace width and t is thickness. The conductor DC losses are directly related to Rdc and are frequency independent. DC losses are negligible for short traces of large crosssections and become important for long lines of small cross-sectional geometries and for multi-drop topologies. In Equation 6, Rac symbolizes the AC conductor resistance per unit length and ό is the skin depth. Rac can be reduced by widening the trace width. It varies inversely with ό and FiGurE 8. Impedance computation for a coplanar construct utilizing Si8000. FEBRUARY 2009 printEd CirCuit dESign & fAB
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 Contents Our Line Market Watch Around the World Happenings ROI Tip Jar BGA Bulletin Interconnect Strategies Final Finsh Forum Defects Database Embedded Active Components In Multilayer LCP Packages Simulation: The Need for Speed Advanced Registration Systems The DC Design Squeeze Ad Index Do You Really Want a Better Autorouter? Designing With Conductive Materials, Part 1 Off th eShelf Marketplace On the Forefront Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - (Page Intro) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 (Page Cover1) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 (Page Cover2) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 (Page 1) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Contents (Page 2) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Contents (Page 3) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Our Line (Page 4) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Our Line (Page 5) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Market Watch (Page 6) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Market Watch (Page 7) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Around the World (Page 8) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Around the World (Page 9) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Around the World (Page 10) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Around the World (Page 11) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Happenings (Page 12) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Happenings (Page 13) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - ROI (Page 14) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Tip Jar (Page 15) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - BGA Bulletin (Page 16) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - BGA Bulletin (Page P1) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - BGA Bulletin (Page P2) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - BGA Bulletin (Page P3) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - BGA Bulletin (Page P4) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - BGA Bulletin (Page 17) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Interconnect Strategies (Page 18) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Interconnect Strategies (Page 19) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Final Finsh Forum (Page 20) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Defects Database (Page 21) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Embedded Active Components In Multilayer LCP Packages (Page 22) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Embedded Active Components In Multilayer LCP Packages (Page 23) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Embedded Active Components In Multilayer LCP Packages (Page 24) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Embedded Active Components In Multilayer LCP Packages (Page 25) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Simulation: The Need for Speed (Page 26) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Simulation: The Need for Speed (Page 27) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Simulation: The Need for Speed (Page 28) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Simulation: The Need for Speed (Page 29) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Advanced Registration Systems (Page 30) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Advanced Registration Systems (Page 31) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Advanced Registration Systems (Page 32) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Advanced Registration Systems (Page 33) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - The DC Design Squeeze (Page 34) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - The DC Design Squeeze (Page 35) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - The DC Design Squeeze (Page 36) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Ad Index (Page 37) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Do You Really Want a Better Autorouter? (Page 38) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Do You Really Want a Better Autorouter? (Page 39) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Designing With Conductive Materials, Part 1 (Page 40) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Designing With Conductive Materials, Part 1 (Page 41) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Designing With Conductive Materials, Part 1 (Page 42) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Off th eShelf (Page 43) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Marketplace (Page 44) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Marketplace (Page 45) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Marketplace (Page 46) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - Marketplace (Page 47) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - On the Forefront (Page 48) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - On the Forefront (Page Cover3) Printed Circuit Design & Fab - February 2009 - On the Forefront (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.