Utility Horizons - Second Quarter 2013 - (Page 49)
REGULATION de Rigueur
By: Mark B. Lively | Principal | Utility Economic Engineers
In Support of
Distributed Generation
SPECIAL TARIFF NEEDED
Distributed generation is large in the
US – and itʼs getting bigger. Fifteen
years ago, California alone had 30
GW of distributed generation, which
was only slightly less than the capacity of
Californiaʼs central station power plants.
In the last year, we have seen movements
that will continue to increase the amount
of installed distributed generation. The
amount of energy produced by distributed
generation units is minor. Just as most
of the distributed generation capacity in
California is backup or standby, many
people have been touting distributed
generation for its ability to backup the
grid.
Backing up the grid means that the
distributed generators would pump power
into the grid – not just supply power to
the owners of the distributed generation
– which was the situation in California.
But for significant amounts of distributed
generation output to make it to the grid
to backup the grid, there needs to be a
special tariff that is operational when the
distribution grid is stressed, as I discuss in
this article.
This special tariff would be applicable to
all energy on the distribution grid during
this period of stress, both as payment
to the distributed generators and as
payment by the connected loads.
Growth in Distributed Generation
After the derecho that hit the Washington, DC area
in June 2012, I conducted a survey, asking friends
www.UtilityHorizons.com
how long they were without power. One friend told
me he was without power for six days and finally got
utility power back a half hour after he and his son
installed their own generator. He said humorously
– or at least I thought he was trying to be humorous
– that the utility couldn’t stand the competition.
However, now that he has utility power I doubt that
he often runs his generator. Most of the time the fuel
cost of the generator is greater than the delivered
cost of utility power, especially when one includes
the inconvenience of trips to a filling station to get
gasoline or diesel fuel. But high cost distributed
generation need not be the case.
Another friend is developing the concept of home
cogeneration systems using natural gas. The unit
cost of his fuel per Btu is less than the cost of the
liquid fuel to my other friend. Furthermore, the second
friend’s generator should be much more efficient
at turning the heat of the fuel into electricity. Some
gross calculations (almost back of the envelope
in that he sent me an e-mail with his thoughts and
some numbers) showed that his fuel cost would be
significantly cheaper than the delivered cost of utility
power, so much so that he could earn a return on the
investment in his home cogeneration system.
Washington’s Mayor Vincent Gray has a vision
of reducing energy consumption in the District of
Columbia by 50%. I learned of this while preparing
a presentation for the All Hands Day meeting of the
District Department of the Environment (DDOE). I
pointed out during the meeting that a 50% decline in
the use of electricity in the District would result in a
100% increase in the unit price for wire services.
My reasoning was that PEPCo, the local utility, would
still have the same cost of owning and operating
the wires in DC but would have to recover that cost
from half of the KWH. Standard rate-making ends up
doubling the unit price. And, since Mayor Gray wanted
50% of the remaining energy to be point-of-source
renewable – such as solar – the final result would be
a 300% increase in the unit price for wire services. At
such a price level for wire services, my friend’s home
cogeneration system makes a lot more economic
sense, as would many other distributed generators.
Q2 - 2013 • UTILITY HORIZONS • 49
http://www.UtilityHorizons.com
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Utility Horizons - Second Quarter 2013
Utility Horizons - Second Quarter 2013
Publisher’s Message
Contents
The Queue
Automation Rising!
Inside Tracks
Focal Point
Automation and Innovation at Epcor Water Services
BLeading Edge: Advanced Technology Perspectives
Consumer Engagement: The Future Goes Mobile
Demand Response: Why the Future Is in the Cloud
Building Paths to Smarter Water Management
Bullet-Proofing Your Scada System Against the Evil-Doers
Education Matters
Standard Bearings
Regulation De Rigueur
On the Horizon
Purviews
Intersections
Eventualities
Thinking It Through With Sparky Flamedrop
Loose Ends
Utility Horizons - Second Quarter 2013
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com