POWER January 2022 - 40

COMMENTARY
Ian Palmer, PhD
The Energy Transition Will
Require Staggering Growth
in Electrification and
Enabling Technologies
R
ystad Energy, an independent energy research and business
intelligence company that provides data, tools, analytics,
and consultancy services to the global energy industry,
organized and hosted the " Energy Transition Marathon "
last May. The virtual event addressed the future of the global
transition through 2050 and beyond in seven well-documented
video sessions. Two sessions stood out for their impact on the
power industry.
Global Energy System
The program began with a presentation on the " Global Energy
System, " a complicated network that includes solar and
wind at one end of the spectrum and natural gas, oil, and coal
at the other. Rystad's global predictions for renewables are
nothing short of disruptive: from 7% now to 18% in 2030 to
48% in 2040 to 74% in 2050. The trend in electrification is
also startling. Experts said 23% of global energy is electricity
today but this will be 73% in 2050 (electricity plus battery
storage). We will live in an electric world. Most interesting is
that 64% of energy is globally traded now (the rest is locally
traded) but this will become 24% by 2050. The energy market
as we know it will be deglobalized.
For wind and solar, global investments in energy infrastructure
(upstream and downstream) will be large through 2050.
But they will not be much different from two recent examples
of intensive growth in fossil fuels-the growth of coal power
plants in Asia from 2000 to 2019, and the shale revolution in
the U.S. from 2008 to 2014. Rystad argued that if an effort
similar to the shale boom were directed at wind and solar it
would yield 230,000 small solar PV plants (10 MW to 15 MW),
each costing $6.5 million (plus a similar downstream cost of
grid and batteries) that would amount to a total of 2 TW to 3
TW installed. Rystad made the transition numbers for renewables
seem reasonable and attainable.
Rystad also said global electricity generation from coal
peaked in 2020 and will follow a rapid decline through 2050.
However, China and India aren't expected to peak their coal
usage before 2025. Still, Rystad predicts coal usage for power
plants will end globally by 2065.
CCS, Batteries, and Hydrogen
Carbon capture and storage (CCS), batteries, and hydrogen
support systems are enablers for the energy transition, according
to Rystad, who anticipates vigorous growth for all
three.
Batteries. Batteries are the most important of these support
systems because they are an essential part of the electrification
of power plants, industry, and buildings. Batteries provide
40
stability and reliability when wind and sun go offline. Demand
for batteries is forecast to take off like a rocket after 2025.
Battery usage is obvious in cars and other electric vehicles
(EVs). Large-scale grid batteries-some huge in size and capacity-are
also important. South Australia (SA) offers an interesting
example of a region with greatly expanding battery
capacity. Although SA is a very small state, it has the highest
percentage of renewable electricity in the world (60%), as
well as one of the largest installed battery systems in the
world. In SA, six big batteries are operating, another three
await commissioning, and more than 20 others have started
construction or are awaiting approvals.
Big batteries are cheaper now and are growing faster than
car batteries. However, raw battery material constraints are
likely by 2030, according to Rystad, especially lithium, manganese,
silicon, and phosphorous-another wrinkle for the
future.
CCS. Today, total global CO2
emissions are about 40 gigatonnes/year
(Gt/year). Rystad said about 8 Gt/year (20%) of
this will need to be stored deep underground in safe geological
layers to meet the net-zero goal of 2050. Some of
the leftover CO2
will come from remnant fossil power plants,
transportation, or hard-to-abate industry processes like cement,
chemicals, and metals such as steel. Some of the CO2
will be directly removed from the air.
CCS in 2020 stored only a puny 40 megatonnes (Mt) of
CO2
. Rystad predicts it will need to be 400 Mt/year by 2030,
an increase by 10 times, and 8,000 Mt/year by 2050-a total
increase by 200 times. The numbers are staggering. This
would represent 20% growth in CCS year-over-year, and to
make it happen, the CCS industry would end up as big as the
present-day oil and gas industry, according to Rystad.
Hydrogen. Rystad suggested that liquid hydrogen and derivatives
will be 7% of energy in 2050-in the form of aviation
and shipping fuel, and manufacture of metals and chemicals
(fertilizers and plastics). Hydrogen production will need electricity
for both green (via electrolysis) and blue hydrogen (via
decomposition of natural gas), while the latter will need CCS
to get rid of the CO2
byproduct.
Cost of production of green hydrogen is several times that
of blue hydrogen, largely because of the higher cost of renewable
electricity and electrolysis. Hydrogen is expensive now.
Although prices will come down over time, it seems a case of
too little too late for other than niche applications. ■
-Ian Palmer, PhD is a petroleum engineer and consultant.
He is the author of The Shale Controversy, and has worked
at Los Alamos, the U.S. Department of Energy, BP,
and Higgs-Palmer Technologies.
www.powermag.com
POWER | January 2022
http://www.powermag.com
POWER January 2022

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of POWER January 2022
