DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. The authors assert that research on group process has been lacking. Given that group process is a commonly used tool in evaluating RA candidates, why do you think the research has been so limited thus far? 2. What methods may be used to train staff to be fair evaluators and eliminate subjective bias during group process? How should training methods differ between professional staff and student staff? 3. What are ways your institution may help increase the ability for candidates to present their authentic selves and express themselves more freely? 4. Do you believe group process is a just evaluative tool for candidates? What other considerations might need examination when determining just evaluation practices? 5. The authors emphasize candidates should be learning and growing throughout group process. What knowledge or skills do candidates gain by participating in the hiring process at your institution? 6. Throughout the article the authors suggest group process activities and evaluation rubrics reflect the RA job responsibilities and duties. In your experience with group process, how are candidates evaluated based on competencies or skills directly related to the RA position? Discussion questions developed by Allynn L. Delaney, Residential Life Coordinator at The University of Texas at Dallas and Michael " Cody " Queen, Assistant Residential Life Coordinator at The University of Texas at Dallas. Volume 47, No. 3 * 2021 27