VALERIJA GALIC 1441 Question 8: Do you think that henceforth the European constitutional courts must consider themselves as ordinary jurisdictions of European law? No. Non. Question 9: Do you hold that in certain cases a referral by the constitutional court to the CJEU might be compulsory and wise? And what do you think about requesting an advisory opinion from the ECtHR? I hold that in certain cases a referral by the constitutional court to the CJEU might be compulsory and wise. I consider that requesting an advisory opinion from the ECtHR is useful. J'estime que, dans certains cas, le renvoi d'une question préjudicielle à la CJUE est obligatoire et judicieux. Je considère que demander un avis à la CEDH est utile. Question 10: From the CJEU's point of view, is a constitutional court a court like the others? There is no appropriate case-law in BiH on the basis of which it would be possible to answer this question. Il n'existe pas de jurisprudence en B-H qui permettrait de répondre à cette question. Question 11: From the ECtHR's point of view, is a constitutional court a court like the others? Yes. Oui. Question 12: Could you indicate how you are using the European case law in your daily work? Do you use it frequently? What is your spontaneous reaction? The case-law of the European Court of Human Rights is used frequently. This caselaw is very useful. La jurisprudence de la CEDH est utilisée fréquemment. Elle est très utile. Question 13: Within your Court does a panel, a department or a lawyer exist that is specialized in European Law? No. Non. Question 14: What do you think about the dialogue of judges and its functioning? What is your personal experience with this dialogue? The dialogue of judges is always desirable, useful, however it has been insufficiently engaged in so far. Le dialogue des juges est toujours désirable et utile mais il n'a pas été engagé assez loin jusqu'à présent.