must allege facts sufficient to overcome the presumption of rationality that applies to government classification. In this instance, the federal district court noted Mayle had alleged that he was " aggressively ridiculed, harassed and heckled by patrons when he brought the Guinea Hog to public recreational services. " Further, the federal district court found the DOJ service animal regulations had identified a legitimate governmental interest in " maintaining public order and imposing limits on the types of animals allowed in public places. " According to the court: " Mayle's own recounting of the disruption that ensued when he " The first name in wood for play " took his Guinea Hog into public parks demonstrates why the regulation is rational. " Having found a rational relationship between the limited regulatory definition of " service animals " and a legitimate governmental interest in maintaining public order in public places, the federal district court rejected Mayle's equal protection claim. Reasonable Accommodations " ...a requested modification would be considered " reasonable " under the ADA if an accommodation was found " necessary " for the disabled individual to " fully enjoy the services and facilities of a public entity without fundamentally altering the nature of the public services and facilities. " In his complaint, Mayle also claimed " the denial of his Guinea Hog is a violation of the public entities' responsibility to provide reasonable accommodations to people with disabilities under the ® Classic TimberForm TM Foreground: Log Scramble www.TimberForm.com 1-800/547-1940 | HQ@timberform.com W W W. PA R K S A N D R E C R E AT I O N . O R G | O C T O B E R 2 0 1 9 | Parks & Recreation 23