IEEE Technology and Society Magazine - June 2021 - 92

Feature
[33] W. Faulkner, " 'Nuts and bolts and people':
Gender-troubled engineering identities, " Social Stud.
Sci., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331-356, Jun. 2007, doi:
10.1177/0306312706072175.
[34] L. Floridi, " Distributed morality in an information
society, " Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 727-743,
Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9413-4.
[35] M. Alavi and D. E. Leidner, " Review: Knowledge
management and knowledge management systems:
Conceptual foundations and research issues, "
MIS Quart., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 107-136, Mar. 2001,
doi: 10.2307/3250961.
[36] A. H. Gold, A. Malhotra, and A. H. Segars,
" Knowledge management: An organizational
capabilities perspective, " J. Manage. Inf. Syst.,
vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 185-214, May 2001, doi:
10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669.
[37] M. Brundage et al., " Toward trustworthy AI
development: Mechanisms for supporting verifiable
claims, " 2020, arXiv:2004.07213. [Online]. Available:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07213
[38] J. B. de Vasconcelos et al., " The application of
knowledge management to software evolution, " Int. J.
Inf. Manage., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1499-1506, Feb. 2017,
doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.005.
[39] J. C. Newman, " Decision points in AI governance:
Three case studies explore efforts to operationalize
AI principles, " CLTC, Berkeley, CA, USA, White Paper,
May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://cltc.berkeley.edu/
wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Decision_Points_AI_
Governance.pdf
[40] J. Morley et al., " From what to how: An initial review
of publicly available AI ethics tools, methods and
research to translate principles into practices, " Sci.
Eng. Ethics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2141-2168, Dec. 2019,
doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5.
[41] R. Guidotti et al., " A survey of methods for explaining
black box models, " ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 51, no. 5,
pp. 93:1-93:42, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1145/3236009.
[42] T. Bolukbasi et al., " Man is to computer programmer
as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word
embeddings, " in Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems 29, D. D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U. V.
Luxburg, I. Guyon, and R. Garnett, Eds. New York, NY,
USA: Curran Associates, Inc., 2016, pp. 4349-4357.
[43] W.-W. Zhao, " Improving social responsibility of artificial
intelligence by using ISO 26000, " in Proc. IOP Conf.
Ser., Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 428, Oct. 2018, Art. no.
012049, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/428/1/012049.
92
[44] IEEE Recommended Practice for Assessing the
Impact of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems on
Human well-Being, IEEE Standard 7010-2020, May
2020. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
servlet/opac?punumber=9084217
[45] M. C. Oetzel and S. Spiekermann, " A systematic
methodology for privacy impact assessments: A design
science approach, " Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 23, no. 2,
pp. 126-150, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1057/ejis.2013.18.
[46] B. Friedman, D. G. Hendry, and A. Borning, " A survey
of value sensitive design methods, " Found. Trends ®
Human-Comput. Interact., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 63-125,
Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1561/1100000015.
[47] R. V. Schomberg, " A vision of responsible research and
innovation, " in Responsible Innovation. Hoboken, NJ,
USA: Wiley, 2013, pp. 51-74.
[48] V. Dignum, " Ethics in artificial intelligence: Introduction
to the special issue, " Ethics Inf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 1,
pp. 1-3, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10676-018-9450-z.
[49] R. A. Calvo, D. Peters, and S. Cave, " Advancing impact
assessment for intelligent systems, " Nature Mach.
Intell., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 8991, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1038/
s42256-020-0151-z.
[50] M. Latonero, " Governing artificial intelligence:
Upholding human rights & dignity, " Data Soc., New
York, NY, USA, Tech. Rep., Oct. 2018. [Online].
Available: https://datasociety.net/wp-content/
uploads/2018/10/DataSociety_Governing_Artificial_
Intelligence_Upholding_Human_Rights.pdf
[51] C. M. Radaelli, " Measuring policy learning: Regulatory
impact assessment in Europe, " J. Eur. Public Policy,
vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1145-1164, Dec. 2009, doi:
10.1080/13501760903332647.
[52] D. Reisman et al., " Algorithmic impact assessments: A
practical framework for public agency accountability, "
AI Now, New York, NY, USA, Tech. Rep., Apr.
2018. [Online]. Available: https://ainowinstitute.org/
aiareport2018.pdf
[53] D. Schiff et al., " IEEE 7010: A new standard for
assessing the well-being implications of artificial
intelligence, " in Proc. IEEE SMC, Oct. 2020,
pp. 2746-2753.
[54] European Commission, High-Level Expert Group on
Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG). (Apr. 2019). European
Commission: Ethical Guidelines for Trustworthy AI.
[Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/
dae/document.cfm?doc_id=58477
[55] J. Saltz et al., " Integrating ethics within machine
learning courses, " ACM Trans. Comput. Edu., vol. 19,
no. 4, pp. 32:1-32:26, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1145/3341164.
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=9084217 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=9084217 http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2004.07213 https://www.datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/DataSociety_Governing_Artificial_Intelligence_Upholding_Human_Rights.pdf https://www.datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/DataSociety_Governing_Artificial_Intelligence_Upholding_Human_Rights.pdf https://www.datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/DataSociety_Governing_Artificial_Intelligence_Upholding_Human_Rights.pdf https://cltc.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Decision_Points_AI_Governance.pdf https://cltc.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Decision_Points_AI_Governance.pdf https://cltc.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Decision_Points_AI_Governance.pdf https://www.ainowinstitute.org/aiareport2018.pdf https://www.ainowinstitute.org/aiareport2018.pdf https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=58477 https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=58477

IEEE Technology and Society Magazine - June 2021

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of IEEE Technology and Society Magazine - June 2021