IEEE Technology and Society Magazine - Summer 2013 - 58

the priorities in that field to recognize that the traditional view of the
relationship between science and
engineering is untenable. If that is
true for researchers in science and
engineering, it should also be true for
those of us who teach them ethics.

Author Information
The author is with the School of
Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Science and Technology
Studies Department, Cornell university, Ithaca, NY.

Acknowledgment
This paper was presented at the
workshop, "Practical Guidance
on Science and Engineering Ethics Education for Instructors and
Administrators," National Academy of Engineering, Washington,
DC, Dec. 12, 2012. I would like to
thank rachelle Hollander for organizing the workshop and her and
other participants for their comments on the paper.

References

[1] D. Johnson, "Do engineers have social
responsibility?" J. Applied Ethics, vol. 9,
pp. 21-34, 1992.
[2] M. Davis, "'Ain't no one here but us
social forces:' Constructing the professional
responsibility of engineers," Science and
Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, p. 13-34, 2012.
[3] M. Davis, "'Social responsibility' and
'social justice' for engineers?" Engineering
Dimensions, Ontario Centre for Engineering
and Public Policy, to be published.

58

|

[4] r. McGinn, "Ethical responsibilities of
nanotechnology researchers: A short guide,"
Nanoethics, vol. 4, pp. 1-12, 2010.
[5] D. Schuurbiers, "What happens in the
lab: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory,"
Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 17,
pp. 769-788, 2011.
[6] C. Whitbeck, Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research. Cambridge, u.K.: Cambridge univ. Press, 1995.
[7] r. Kline, "research ethics, engineering
ethics, and science and technology studies,"
in Encyclopedia of Science, Technology,
and Ethics, C. Mitcham, Ed. New York, NY:
MacMillan, 2005, vol. 1, pp. xxxv-xli.
[8] C. Mitcham, "Co-responsibility for research integrity," Science and Engineering
Ethics, vol. 9, pp. 273-290, 2003.
[9] C. Mitcham, "Professional idealism among
scientists and engineers: A neglected tradition in STS studies," Technology in Society,
vol. 25, pp. 249-262, 2003.
[10] r. Kline, "using history and sociology
to teach engineering ethics," IEEE Technology & Society Mag., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 13-20,
2001/2002.
[11] M. Davis, "Three myths about codes of engineering ethics," IEEE Technology & Society
Magazine, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 8-14, 2001.
[12] W. Broad and W. Nicholas, Betrayers of
the Truth. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1982, ch. 1.
[13] B.D. Gold, "Congressional activities regarding misconduct and integrity in science,"
in Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, Panel on
Scientific responsibility and the Conduct of
research, vol. 2. Washington, DC: National
Acad. Press, 1992-1993, ch. 2.
[14] D.J. Kevles, The Baltimore Case: A Trial
of Politics, Science, and Character. New
York, NY: Norton, 1998, ch. 8.
[15] B. Lewenstein, "Cold fusion and
hot history," Osiris, 2nd series, vol. 7,
pp. 135-163, 1992.
[16] B. Goss Levi, "Investigation finds that
one Lucent physicist engaged in scientific
misconduct," Physics Today, p. 15, Nov. 2002.

[17] Committee on the Conduct of Science,
On Being a Scientist. Washington, DC:
National Acad. Press, 1989; and in Proc.
National Academy of Science, vol. 86, 1989,
p. 9072.
[18] Committee on Science, Engineering, and
Public Policy, On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research, 2nd ed. Washington,
DC: National Acad. Press, 1995, p. 20.
[19] Committee on Science, Engineering, and
Public Policy, On Being a Scientist: A Guide
to Responsible Conduct in Research, 3rd ed.
Washington, DC: National Acad., 2009.
[20] O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and
J. Wajcman, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, E.J. Hackett, Ed., 3rd ed.
Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 2008, Part III.
[21] Online Ethics Center for Engineering, "A pHish Tale," National Academy
of Engineering, May 4, 2006; http://www.
onlineethics.org/resources/Cases/pHISH.
ASPX, accessed, Nov. 20, 2012.
[22] B. Lewenstein, "What counts as a 'social
and ethical issue' in nanotechnology," in Nanotechnology: Implications for Philosophy, Ethics, and Society, J. Schummer and D. Baird,
Eds. Singapore: World Scientific, 2006, ch. 10.
[23] J. Herkert, "Ways of thinking about and
teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics
and macroethics in engineering," Science and
Engineering Ethics, vol. 11, pp. 373-385, 2005.
[24] r. Kline, "Engineering case studies:
Bridging micro and macro ethics," IEEE
Technology & Society Mag., vol. 29, no. 4,
pp. 16-19, Wint. 2010.
[25] Committee on Science, Engineering, and
Public Policy, Panel on Scientific responsibility and the Conduct of research, Responsible
Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research
Process, 2 vols. Washington, DC, 1992-1993.
[26] A. Shamoo and D. resnik, The Responsible Conduct of Research. Oxford, u.K.:
Oxford univ. Press, 2009.
[27] M.W. Martin and r. Schinzinger, Ethics in Engineering, 4th ed. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill, 2005.
[28] J. Herkert, "Engineering ethics education
in the u.S.A.: Content, pedagogy, and curriculum," Euro. J. Engineering Education,
vol. 25, pp. 303-313, 2000.

IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE

|

SuMMEr 2013
http://www http://www.onlineethics.org/resources/Cases/pHISH
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of IEEE Technology and Society Magazine - Summer 2013
