Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 157

IMPLEMENTING OPT-OUT HIV TESTING
157
suggests that the majority of HIV-positive incarcerated
individuals contract the virus before incarceration (Hammett,
2006; Valera et al., 2017).
Correctional settings present a unique opportunity to
test and treat people living with HIV, many of whom are
unaware of their status before being incarcerated. Since
2006, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) has recommended routine opt-out HIV testing-
where all patients are routinely tested for HIV unless
they explicitly opt-out, regardless of their reported risk
behaviors-in all clinical settings, including correctional
facilities (Branson et al., 2006; CDC, 2011; MacGowan,
2009). Routine opt-out testing in correctional settings
aligns with the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United
States 2022-2025 goal to reduce new HIV infections by
75% by 2025, in which correctional facilities are noted
as instrumental in the identification, engagement, and
reengagement of individuals in HIV care (The White
House, 2021).
However, local jails in the United States frequently do
not routinely test for HIV due to competing priorities,
concerns about funding for testing and treatment, stigma
among correctional staff, lack of recognition of need, and
low acceptance of routine HIV testing as an effective intervention
(Beckwith et al., 2012; Solomon et al., 2014).
The transient nature of people in correctional settings
makes HIV testing even more difficult. Nationally, the
median length of a jail stay is only 2 to 5 days, posing
a logistical challenge for a provider to administer a test,
receive results, and notify an individual of their status,
all before a person's release, particularly if the person
presents with other acute medical or mental health conditions
(Anderson-Minshall, 2016; Spaulding et al., 2011).
Alameda County Jails
Alameda County has two jails-the Santa Rita Jail in
Dublin and the Glenn E. Dyer Detention Facility, a
high-rise, maximum-security jail in Oakland, California.
Operated by the Alameda County Sheriff's Office, the
jails have the capacity to house 4,000 people daily.
Approximately 45,910 people were booked in the jails
in 2017, and the average length of stay was 23 days. Of
the total 2017 jail population, 49.0% of individuals
were Black, 26.5% Latinx, 17.1% white, 2.8% Asian,
and 4.6% identified as another race or ethnicity (Waldura,
personal communication, 2018). Approximately 1% of
individuals self-disclosed an HIV-positive status during
the intake process.
Between 2012 and 2017, the California Office of AIDS
(OA) was provided with CDC Category B HIV Prevention
funds to implement a routine opt-out testing program
in Alameda County jails. The program goal was to implement
and sustain routine testing to identify undiagnosed
cases of HIV, link those who were newly diagnosed to
care, and reengage those who were previously diagnosed
but not in care. Services (Cardea), in collaboration with
the Pacific AIDS Education and Training Center, provided
staff training, technical assistance on the development
and implementation of testing protocols, and data
collection and evaluation support.
Program data were analyzed to support program
implementation, assess whether testing was being implemented
routinely, and determine to what extent the program
was able to identify new cases of HIV and link
individuals to care. Using a continuous quality improvement
process based on the plan-do-study-act (PDSA)
model, testing data were reviewed with jail program
staff on a quarterly basis to examine trends in testing volume,
positivity rates, and linkage data. These data review
sessions were coupled with discussions on implementation
challenges, barriers, and successes, and led to identification
of strategies for program improvement.
The purpose of this article is to share findings and lessons
learned from data collected for evaluation and continuous
quality improvement of the routine testing
program in the Alameda County jails. Authors examine
whether routine testing in the jails is feasible to implement
and successful in both identifying new positive
HIV cases, using a benchmark of 0.1% positivity, and engaging
or reengaging those living with HIV in medical
care.
Summary of Alameda County's Routine Testing
Program
The routine testing program evolved over the 6-year period.
At the program's start, individuals in custody requesting
a medical visit, referred to as a ''sick call,'' were
offered an oral rapid test. After the first 2 years, testing
was also implemented during health and physical exams,
which are completed routinely for those housed in the
two jail facilities for at least 14 days. Testing at booking
into custody was not feasible due to the layout of the
jail's booking area and concerns with patient privacy.
All patients were informed that the HIV test was part
of the standard of care and would be conducted unless
they declined (opt-out screening strategy). Additional
written consent was not required, per state legislation
Assembly Bill 682 (A.B. 682, 2007). A conventional antigen/antibody
blood test was conducted for patients receiving
a blood draw as a part of their medical visit.
For all other patients, nursing staff or medical assistants
administered an oral rapid test.
The conventional blood test took 3 to 5 days for results
and patients were only notified of a positive or indeterminate
result. Rapid tests provided results within 20 minutes,
although nurses and medical assistants who administered
the tests did not read the results in front of the patients; instead,
individuals were told ''no news is good news'' and
those with a preliminary positive were contacted within
24 to 48 hours. For those with a preliminary positive

Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023

Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - Cover1
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - Cover2
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 89
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 90
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 91
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 92
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 93
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 94
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 95
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 96
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 97
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 98
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 99
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 100
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 101
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 102
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 103
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 104
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 105
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 106
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 107
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 108
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 109
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 110
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 111
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 112
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 113
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 114
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 115
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 116
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 117
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 118
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 119
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 120
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 121
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 122
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 123
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 124
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 125
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 126
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 127
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 128
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 129
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 130
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 131
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 132
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 133
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 134
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 135
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 136
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 137
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 138
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 139
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 140
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 141
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 142
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 143
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 144
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 145
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 146
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 147
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 148
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 149
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 150
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 151
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 152
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 153
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 154
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 155
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 156
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 157
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 158
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 159
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 160
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 161
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 162
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 163
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 164
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 165
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 166
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 167
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - 168
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - Cover3
Journal of Correctional Health Care - April 2023 - Cover4
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com