TABLE 2. Relationship between awareness of GAPs and current farming practices GAP Practicea Managing current practice Not managing current practice n (%) n (%) Water quality 64 (47) 71 (53) 0.00 Manure & municipal biosolids 74 (55) 61 (45) 2.50 Worker health and hygiene 82 (61) 53 (39) 2.40 Sanitary facilities 98 (73) 37 (27) 2.42 Field sanitation 96 (71) 39 (29) 0.13 Packing facility sanitation 81 (60) 54 (40) 2.22 Transportation 86 (64) 49 (36) 7.72** 2 (1) 133 (99) 1.85 I choose not to implement GAPs Chi2 Respondents were allowed to indicate more than one response (n = 135). * = P < .05 ** = P < .01 *** = P < .001 a TABLE 3. Relationship between size of land used for locally grown produce and management of GAPs GAP Practicea Land used for growing produce 1 acre or less 2 acres 3 acres 4 acres 5-10 acres > 10 acres Total Chi2 (n = 150) Managing water quality Managing manure & municipal biosolids Managing worker health & hygiene Managing facilities sanitation Managing field sanitation Managing packing facility sanitation Managing transportation I choose not to implement GAPs n (%) 9 (53) 9 (53) 7 (41) 8 (47) 12 (71) 7 (41) 7 (41) (0) 0 n (%) 13 (41) 11 (34) 13 (41) 25 (78) 19 (59) 15 (47) 15 (47) 0 (0) n (%) 15 (63) 18 (75) 19 (79) 21 (88) 20 (83) 17 (71) 17 (71) 0 (0) n (%) 13 (52) 16 (64) 21 (84) 21 (84) 19 (76) 20 (80) 19 (76) 1 (4) n (%) 15 (41) 20 (54) 18 (49) 20 (54) 25 (68) 20 (54) 24 (65) 2 (5) n (%) n (%) 6 (40) 71 (47) 5 (33) 79 (53) 10 (67) 88 (59) 11 (73) 106 (71) 11 (73) 106 (71) 8 (53) 87 (58) 15 (100) 150 (100) 0 (0) 3 (2) 4.23 12.7* 19.1*** 15.8** 4.4 10.6 9.3 4.5 Respondents were allowed to indicate more than one response (n = 150). * = P < .05 ** = P < .01 *** = P < .001 a March/April Food Protection Trends 115