TABLE 3. Logit estimates examining if time use and shopping choices affect food thermometer use (1) (2) (3) (4) Added Shopping Choice Added Time Use Added Both Marginal Effects 0.33*** (0.06) 0.54*** (0.08) 0.38*** (0.07) -0.44*** (0.1) 0.02 (0.07) -0.03 (0.06) 0.06** (0.03) 0.07 (0.07) -0.002 (0.07) 0.10 (0.07) 0.02 (0.07) 0.39*** (0.06) 0.50*** (0.08) 0.43*** (0.07) -0.46*** (0.09) -0.004 (0.07) -0.02 (0.06) 0.06** (0.03) 0.11* (0.07) 0.06 (0.07) 0.13* (0.07) 0.08 (0.07) 0.35*** (0.06) 0.53*** (0.08) 0.39*** (0.07) -0.46*** (0.1) 0.02 (0.07) 0.01 (0.06) 0.05* (0.03) 0.07 (0.07) 0.01 (0.07) 0.10 (0.07) 0.03 (0.07) 4.15*** (0.79) 5.91*** (0.9) 4.77*** (0.99) -4.63*** (0.89) 0.23 (0.78) 0.13 (0.66) 0.61* (0.34) 0.80 (0.78) 0.09 (0.78) 1.11 (0.84) 0.29 (0.8) 0.09 (0.06) 1.03 (0.68) -0.06 (0.1) 0.03 (0.07) 0.36*** (0.08) 18,556 -0.62 (1.06) 0.34 (0.85) 4.45*** (1.13) 18,556 Baseline Controls: Male Married Age 34 or Less Hispanic B.A. or Higher Employed Anywhere Total People in Home Midwest Location Income Above 185% of Poverty Line Year 2015 Year 2016 Shopping Choice: Grocery Store 0.09 (0.06) Time Use (avg. day): Over 30 min. Food Shopping Over 90 min. Eating Over 120 min. Preparing Meals n 18,556 -0.07 (0.09) 0.06 (0.07) 0.36*** (0.08) 20,280 Notes: Logit regression estimates are provided in columns 1-3. Average marginal effects are provided in column 4 and are based on the logit regression estimates in column 3. Standard errors in parentheses. *P < .10; **P < .05; ***P < .01 24 Food Protection Trends January/February