Mistakes in ... 2021 - 20

ueg education
Mistakes in... 2021
28. Yamashita Y, et al. Value of contrast-enhanced
harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography with
enhancement pattern for diagnosis of pancreatic
cancer: A meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: 125-133.
29. Seicean A, et al. Harmonic contrast-enhanced
endoscopic ultrasonography for the guidance of
fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic masses.
Ultraschall Med 2017; 38: 174-182.
30. Antonini F, et al. Biliary plastic stent does not
influence the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasoundguided
sampling of pancreatic head masses
performed with core biopsy needles. Dig Liver Dis
2017; 49: 898-902.
31. Bekkali NLH, et al. Impact of metal and plastic stents
on endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration
cytology and core histology of head of pancreas
masses. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 1044-1050.
32. Kim JJ, et al. Lower yield of endoscopic ultrasoundguided
fine-needle aspiration in patients with
pancreatic head mass with a biliary stent. Dig Dis Sci
2015; 60: 543-549.
33. Siddiqui AA, et al. Comparison of the influence of
plastic and fully covered metal biliary stents on the
accuracy of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic
cancer. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 2438-2445.
34. Ranney N, et al. Impact of biliary stents on EUSguided
FNA of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest
Endosc 2012; 76: 76-83.
35. Fisher JM, Gordon SR and Gardner TB. The impact of
prior biliary stenting on the accuracy and
complication rate of endoscopic ultrasound fineneedle
aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic
adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2011; 40: 21-24.
36. Kamata K, et al. Impact of avascular areas, as
measured by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS, on
the accuracy of FNA for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 158-163.
37. Liu S, et al. Can endorectal ultrasound, MRI, and
mucosa integrity accurately predict the complete
response for mid-low rectal cancer after preoperative
chemoradiation? a prospective observational study
from a single medical center. Dis Colon Rectum 2018;
61: 903-910.
38. Wang KX, et al. Assessment of morbidity and
mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a
systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;
73: 283-290.
39. Gress F, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of
the pancreas: evaluation of pancreatitis as a
complication. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 864-867.
40. Varadarajulu S and Eloubeidi MA. Frequency and
significance of acute intracystic hemorrhage during
EUS-FNA of cystic lesions of the pancreas.
Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 631-635.
41. Tarantino I, et al. Complications of endoscopic
ultrasound fine needle aspiration on pancreatic cystic
lesions: final results from a large prospective
multicenter study. Dig Liver Dis 2014; 46: 41-44.
42. Zhu H, et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality
associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle
aspiration for pancreatic cystic lesions: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc
2017; 29: 667-675.
43. Kawakubo K, et al. A Prospective Multicenter Study
Evaluating Bleeding Risk after Endoscopic
Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Patients
Prescribed Antithrombotic Agents. Gut Liver 2018; 12:
353-359.
44. Veitch AM, et al. Endoscopy in patients on antiplatelet
or anticoagulant therapy, including direct oral
anticoagulants: British Society of Gastroenterology
(BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal
Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. Endoscopy 2016;
48: C1.
45. Polkowski M, et al. Learning, techniques, and
complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)guided
sampling in gastroenterology: European
Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)
Technical Guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 190-206.
46. Annema JT, et al. Mediastinitis caused by EUS-FNA
of a bronchogenic cyst. Endoscopy 2003;
35: 791-793.
47. Valli PV, Gubler C and Bauerfeind P. Severe infectious
complications after endoscopic ultrasound-guided
8
fine needle aspiration of suspected mediastinal
duplication cysts: a case series. Inflamm Intest Dis
2017; 1: 165-171.
48. Han C, et al. A case report of esophageal
bronchogenic cyst and review of the literature with
an emphasis on endoscopic ultrasonography
appearance. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: E3111.
49. Grandjean JP, et al. Vestigial retrorectal cystic tumors
in adults: a review of 30 cases. Gastroenterol Clin Biol
2008; 32: 769-778.
50. Krishnan K, et al. Enhanced EUS imaging (with
videos) Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 323-333.
51. Fusaroli P, et al. Contrast harmonic echo-endoscopic
ultrasound improves accuracy in diagnosis of solid
pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010;
8: 629-634.e1-2.
52. Kitano M, et al. Characterization of small solid tumors
in the pancreas: the value of contrast-enhanced
harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J
Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 303-310.
53. Pancreas ESGoCTot. European evidence-based
guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Gut 2018;
67: 789-804.
54. Kamata K, et al. Value of additional endoscopic
ultrasonography for surveillance after surgical
removal of intraductal papillary mucinous
neoplasms. Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 659-666.
55. Oyama H, et al. Long-term Risk of Malignancy in
Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous
Neoplasms. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 226-237.e5.
56. Tang JY, et al. Value of contrast-enhanced harmonic
endoscopic ultrasonography in differentiating
between gastrointestinal stromal tumors:
A meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2019; 20: 127-134.
57. Lisotti A and Fusaroli P. Contrast-enhanced EUS for
the differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy:
technical improvement with defined indications.
Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 995-996.
58. Yoshida K, et al. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced EUS for
lymphadenopathy: a prospective multicenter pilot
study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2019;
90: 242-250.
59. Iglesias-Garcia J, et al. Quantitative endoscopic
ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the
differentiation of solid pancreatic masses.
Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1172-1180.
60. Van Gulik TM, et al. Incidence and clinical findings of
benign, inflammatory disease in patients resected for
presumed pancreatic head cancer. Gastrointest
Endosc 1997; 46: 417-423.
61. Chari ST, et al. Histopathologic and clinical subtypes
of autoimmune pancreatitis: the Honolulu consensus
document. Pancreas 2010; 39: 549-554.
62. Shimosegawa T, et al. International consensus
diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis:
guidelines of the International Association of
Pancreatology. Pancreas 2011; 40: 352-358.
63. Löhr JM, et al. European Guideline on IgG4-related
digestive disease - UEG and SGF evidence-based
recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J,
2020; 8: 637-666.
64. Kamisawa T, et al. Clinical difficulties in the
differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis and
pancreatic carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:
2694-2699.
65. Taniguchi T, et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis detected
as a mass in the head of the pancreas without
hypergammaglobulinemia, which relapsed after
surgery: case report and review of the literature.
Dig Dis Sci 2003; 48: 1465-1471.
66. Fujii-Lau LL and Levy MJ. The role of endoscopic
ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune
pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2017; 27:
643-655.
67. Farrell JJ, et al. EUS findings in patients with
autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;
60: 927-936.
68. Buscarini E, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography
findings in autoimmune pancreatitis. World J
Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 2080-2085.
69. Kamisawa T, et al. Role of endoscopy in the diagnosis
of autoimmune pancreatitis and immunoglobulin
G4-related sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Endosc 2014;
26: 627-635.
70. Koyama R, et al. Ultrasonographic imaging of bile
duct lesions in autoimmune pancreatitis. Pancreas
2008; 37: 259-264.
71. De Lisi S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography findings
in autoimmune pancreatitis: be aware of the
ambiguous features and look for the pivotal ones. Jop
2010; 11: 78-84.
72. Kitano M, et al. A novel perfusion imaging technique
of the pancreas: contrast-enhanced harmonic
EUS (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008;
67: 141-150.
73. Piscaglia F, et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and
recommendations on the clinical practice of
contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011
on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 2012;
33: 33-59.
74. Dietrich CF, et al. EUS elastography: how to do it?
Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 20-28.
75. Cosgrove D, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and
recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound
elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall
Med 2013; 34: 238-253.
76. Ohno E, et al. Feasibility and usefulness of
endoscopic ultrasonography-guided shear-wave
measurement for assessment of autoimmune
pancreatitis activity: a prospective exploratory study.
J Med Ultrason (2001) 2019; 46: 425-433.
77. Learn PA, et al. Pitfalls in avoiding operation for
autoimmune pancreatitis. Surgery 2011;
150: 968-974.
78. Holmes BJ, et al. Fine needle aspirate of autoimmune
pancreatitis (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing
pancreatitis): cytomorphologic characteristics and
clinical correlates. Acta Cytol 2012; 56: 228-232.
79. Iwashita T, et al. Use of samples from endoscopic
ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in
diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 316-322.
80. Kerdsirichairat T, et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis
diagnosed with core biopsy obtained from a novel
fork-tip EUS Needle. ACG Case Rep J 2017; 4: E7.
81. Detlefsen S, Joergensen MT and Mortensen MB.
Microscopic findings in EUS-guided fine needle
(sharkcore) biopsies with type 1 and type 2
autoimmune pancreatitis. Pathol Int 2017;
67: 514-520.
82. Kurita A, et al. Comparison of a 22-gauge Franseen-tip
needle with a 20-gauge forward-bevel needle for the
diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: a
prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter
study (COMPAS study). Gastrointest Endosc 2020;
91: 373-381.e2.
83. Ishikawa T, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic
ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the
diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using a
22-gauge Franseen needle: a prospective multicenter
study. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 978-985.
84. Sun B, et al. Review article: Asia-Pacific consensus
recommendations on endoscopic tissue acquisition
for biliary strictures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018;
48: 138-151.
85. Chiang A, et al. The incremental benefit of EUS for the
identification of malignancy in indeterminate
extrahepatic biliary strictures: A systematic review
and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2019;
8: 310-317.
86. Jo JH, et al. Same-session endoscopic ultrasoundguided
fine needle aspiration and endoscopic
retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based tissue
sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction:
A multicenter experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol
2019; 34: 799-805.
87. De Moura DTH, et al. Endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic
ultrasound for tissue diagnosis of malignant biliary
stricture: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 10-19.
88. Heimbach JK, et al. Trans-peritoneal fine needle
aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is
associated with disease dissemination. HPB (Oxford),
2011; 13: 356-360.
89. Faulx AL, et al. The role of endoscopy in subepithelial
lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;
85: 1117-1132.

Mistakes in ... 2021

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Mistakes in ... 2021

Mistakes in ... 2021 - 1
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 2
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 3
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 4
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 5
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 6
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 7
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 8
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 9
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 10
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 11
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 12
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 13
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 14
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 15
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 16
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 17
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 18
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 19
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 20
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 21
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 22
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 23
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 24
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 25
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 26
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 27
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 28
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 29
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 30
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 31
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 32
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 33
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 34
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 35
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 36
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 37
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 38
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 39
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 40
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 41
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 42
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 43
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 44
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 45
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 46
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 47
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 48
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 49
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 50
Mistakes in ... 2021 - 51
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com