WSO December 2023 – Issue 3 - 1217

Pirlog et al.
1217
ORCID iDs
Bianca O Pirlog
William J Jones
Babak B Navi
Ilana Spokoyny
Kelly Silnes
Jeffrey L Saver
Stephanie A Parker
Noopur Singh
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9896-5545
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-7792
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-6072
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6383-2598
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8424-6128
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2269-9313
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2183-4245
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-2251
Supplemental material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
1. Zhao G, Okoro CA, Hsia J, Garvin WS and Town M.
Prevalence of disability and disability types by urban-rural
county classification-U.S., 2016. Am J Prev Med 2019; 57:
749-756.
2. CDC Online Newsroom. CDC: 1 in 4 US adults live with
a disability, https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2018/
p0816-disability.html (accessed 14 April 2022).
3. Kingston A, Robinson L, Booth H, et al. Projections of
multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035:
estimates from the population ageing and care simulation
(PACSim) model. Age Ageing 2018; 47: 374-380.
4. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines
for the early management of patients with acute ischemic
stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management
of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare
professionals from the American Heart Association/American
Stroke Association. Stroke 2019; 50: e344-e418.
5. Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, et al. European Stroke
Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis
for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J 2021; 6: I-LXII.
6. Grotta JC, Yamal JM, Parker SA, et al. Prospective, multicenter,
controlled trial of mobile stroke units. N Engl J Med
2021; 385: 971-981.
7. Ebinger M, Siegerink B, Kunz A, et al. Association between
dispatch of mobile stroke units and functional outcomes
among patients with acute ischemic stroke in Berlin. JAMA
2021; 325: 454-466.
8. Kim JT, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, et al. Treatment with tissue
plasminogen activator in the golden hour and the shape of the
4.5-hour time-benefit curve in the National United States get
with the guidelines-stroke population. Circulation 2017; 135:
128-139.
9. Yamal JM, Rajan SS, Parker SA, et al. Benefits of stroke treatment
delivered using a mobile stroke unit trial. Int J Stroke
2018; 13: 321-327.
10. WebDCU TM Campus-Training Center, https://dcu.musc.
edu/campus/ (accessed 15 June 2022).
11. Saver JL, Filip B, Hamilton S, et al. Improving the reliability
of stroke disability grading in clinical trials and clinical practice.
Stroke 2010; 41: 992-995.
12. Dijkland SA, Voormolen DC, Venema E, et al. Utilityweighted
modified Rankin scale as primary outcome in stroke
trials. Stroke 2018; 49: 965-971.
13. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with
alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J
Med 2008; 359: 1317-1329.
14. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Saloman J, et al. Measuring and valuing
health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2017.
15. Merlino G, Corazza E, Lorenzut S, et al. Efficacy and safety
of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic
stroke and pre-existing disability. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 400.
16. Caruso P, Ajčević M, Furlanis G, et al. Thrombolysis safety
and effectiveness in acute ischemic stroke patients with premorbid
disability. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 72: 180-184.
17. Zhang W, Coote S, Frost T, Dewey HM and Choi PMC. Acute
stroke patients with mild-to-moderate pre-existing disability
should be considered for thrombolysis treatment. J Stroke
Cerebrovasc Dis 2018; 27: 2707-2711.
18. Havenon A, de Sheth K, Johnston KC, et al. Acute ischemic
stroke interventions in the United States and racial, socioeconomic,
and geographic disparities. Neurology 2021; 97:
e2292-e2303.
19. Millán M, Ramos-Pachón A, Dorado L, et al. Predictors of
functional outcome after thrombectomy in patients with prestroke
disability in clinical practice. Stroke 2022; 53: 845-854.
20. Gensicke H, Strbian D, Zinkstok SM, et al. Intravenous
thrombolysis in patients dependent on the daily help of others
before stroke. Stroke 2016; 47: 450-456.
21. Nolte CH, Ebinger M, Scheitz JF, et al. Effects of prehospital
thrombolysis in stroke patients with prestroke dependency.
Stroke 2018; 49: 646-651.
22. Benali F, Kappelhof M, Ospel J, et al. Benefit of successful
reperfusion achieved by endovascular thrombectomy for
patients with ischemic stroke and moderate pre-stroke disability
(mRS 3): results from the MR CLEAN registry. J
Neurointerv Surg 2023; 15: 433-438.
23. Salwi S, Cutting S, Salgado AD, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy
in ischemic stroke patients with severe pre-stroke disability.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020; 29: 104952.
24. Beland B, Bala F and Ganesh A. Thrombolysis for acute
ischemic stroke in patients with premorbid disability: a metaanalysis.
Stroke 2022; 53: 3055-3063.
25. Cooray C, Karlinski M, Kobayashi A, et al. Safety and early
outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic
stroke patients with prestroke disability. Int J Stroke 2021; 16:
710-718.
26. Kastrup A, Roth C, Politi M, et al. Endovascular therapy vs.
thrombolysis in pre-stroke dependent patients with large vessel
occlusions within the anterior circulation. Front Neurol
2021; 12: 666596.
27. Regenhardt RW, Young MJ, Etherton MR, et al. Toward a
more inclusive paradigm: thrombectomy for stroke patients
with pre-existing disabilities. J Neurointerv Surg 2021; 13:
865-868.
28. Gumbinger C, Ringleb P, Ippen F, et al. Outcomes of patients
with stroke treated with thrombolysis according to prestroke
Rankin Scale scores. Neurology 2019; 93: e1834-e1843.
International Journal of Stroke, 18(10)
WSO December 2023 – Issue 3

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of WSO December 2023 – Issue 3
